[tbs-all: 157] Current Cites, June 2003 (fwd)

---------

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Mustafa Akgul (akgul@Bilkent.EDU.TR)
Date: Mon 16 Jun 2003 - 20:47:34 EEST


Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 16:22:21 -0700
From: CITES Moderator <citeschk@LIBRARY.BERKELEY.EDU>
Subject: Current Cites, June 2003
To: PACS-P@LISTSERV.UH.EDU

                               Current Cites

                        Volume 14, no. 6, June 2003

                          Edited by [2]Roy Tennant

           The Library, University of California, Berkeley, 94720
                             ISSN: 1060-2356 -
        http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/CurrentCites/2003/cc03.14.6.html

    Contributors: [3]Charles W. Bailey, Jr., [4]Margaret Gross, [5]Terry
        Huwe, [6]Shirl Kennedy, [7]Leo Robert Klein, Jim Ronningen

     Battelle, John. "[8]Putting Online Ads in Context" [9]Business
     2.0 4(5) (June 2003): 82.
     (http://www.business2.com/articles/mag/0,1640,49475,00.html). - Has
     the Web media world finally stumbled onto a paid advertising model
     that actually works? According to John Battelle, [10]Overture is on
     the verge of rolling out a new service -- "contextual advertising"
     -- that strategically places advertising links adjacent to relevant
     content on websites. No flashing [11]banners, no "[12]skyscrapers,"
     no [13]obnoxious animations that take over your screen. Sound
     familar? It should. We've been seeing this type of advertising on
     [14]Google for awhile now; Google, Battelle points out, "makes a
     mint from selling paid links on its own site, where it keeps all
     the revenue." Google also sells its paid results to [15]AOL,
     [16]Amazon.com, [17]Disney and other sites. According to Battelle,
     this is an advertising model that could work on smaller niche sites
     as well. For example, a site targeted to knitting aficionados could
     generate some income by displaying advertising links for yarn
     companies, sellers of crafts books, etc. Rather than annoying the
     people who browse your website, advertising like this could
     actually be useful. - [18]SK

     Friedman, Raymond A., and Steven C. Currall. "[19]E-Mail
     Escalation: Dispute Exacerbating Elements of Electronic
     Communication" [20]Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt
     University
     (http://www.mba.vanderbilt.edu/ray.friedman/pdf/emailescalation.pdf
     ). - Although this is a scholarly paper studded with footnotes and
     accompanied by an extensive bibliography, its message is fairly
     blunt: E-mail pretty much sucks as a communications medium when
     trying to resolve a dispute. Those of us who have been using
     electronic mail since dinosaurs roamed the earth will not be
     surprised at this finding. We've all seen misunderstandings spiral
     out of control on mailing lists and possibly in our personal
     electronic communications. When powerful cues such as tone of voice
     and immediate response are missing from a verbal exchange, it's all
     too easy to take something the wrong way. Which is why, for
     example, satire can be dangerous in e-mail. Friedman and Currall
     define the properties of e-mail and describe what constitutes
     "conflict escalation." Because e-mail is a "low feedback"
     communications medium, parties to a conflict are not getting the
     information they need about their adversaries' reactions. And this
     void can make a bad situation worse. The authors conclude that
     "e-mail is not the preferred way to manage disputes -- there are
     too many risks. If there is an option to walk down the hallway or
     make a phone call, that is generally preferred." However, these
     options are not always available. If e-mail must be used in
     situations like this, participants to a dispute must be more
     "self-aware." These tips are offered: don't be so quick to
     interpret something as an insult; monitor your reactions for
     "enhanced aggressiveness"; think through what you've written and
     parse it for possible misinterpretations before hitting the send
     key; keep in mind the actual relationship you have with the
     recipient of your message -- i.e., that's a live person on the
     other end; don't overreact to anything you read; aim for a large
     number of interactions that include a single argument rather than
     "bundling large numbers of arguments together," which may overwhelm
     the other person. - [21]SK

     Lipow, Anne Grodzins. The Virtual Reference Librarian's Handbook
       New York, NY: Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc., 2003. - Virtual
     reference, that is to say, "live reference" over the Internet, has
     been a hot topic at many conferences this past year. Anne Grodzins
     Lipow evaluates the challenges and opportunities in her typcially
     pragmatic fashion, so this a good book for practitioners with
     little time to spare. The book is organized to provide readers with
     everything they need to get started, ranging from checklists to
     strategic considerations. Its particular strength is in helping
     readers to examine their own institutional environments
     realistically, and craft programs that can succeed within the
     limitations imposed upon them. The final chapter, covering
     marketing and promotion, is especially strong, and challenges
     information professionals to follow through on this vital (but
     rarely taught) function. Lipow makes the point that we all know we
     "should" promote services, but all too often we relegate marketing
     and promotion to a one-shot effort that is not sustained. Reference
     providers will find not only good tools and checklists in this
     volume, but also a surfeit of challenging and innovative
     perspectives on strategic planning. - [22]TH

     Mihalega, Anna Maria, and Edward A Galloway. ""Your Collection Is
     Online and the Honeymoon's Over: NOW WHAT?" " [23]Computers in
     Libraries 23(6) (June 2003): 26. - Healthy reminder that part of
     the maintenance of any digitization project is dealing with the
     public. This is particularly true with projects on historical
     subjects such as the one mentioned here on [24]Historic Pittsburgh.
     The authors discuss the kind of email traffic they receive and how
     it is handled. This kind of attention on the part of the public,
     particularly from genealogy enthusiasts, can be exacting in
     unexpected ways such as when census data went up on their site with
     less than 100% accuracy. How the team dealt with this and other
     challenges addresses an important point for all institutions,
     namely, the extent of our responsibility to the public for the
     material we make available online. - [25]LRK

     Samuelson, Pamela. "[26]Mapping the Digital Public Domain: Threats
     and Opportunities" [27]Law and Contemporary Problems 66(1 and 2)
     (Winter/Spring 2003): 147-171.
     (http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?66+Law+&+Contemp.+Probs.+147
     +(WinterSpring+2003)). - In this article, noted legal scholar
     Pamela Samuelson presents a "map" of the public domain, provides an
     in-depth examination of threats to it in the digital environment
     (e.g., the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, the
     Collections of Information Anti-Piracy Act, the Copyright Term
     Extension Act, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, and the
     Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act), and discusses ways
     to foster the "digital commons." The analysis of threats is the
     largest and most interesting section of the article, and it weighs
     the relative threat level of the laws and bills and points out that
     the they do not stand alone--there are "potential synergies"
     between them that further endanger the public domain. In the
     paper's conclusion, the author highlights the importance of
     appropriate action by Congress, state legislatures, and the courts
     to preserve the public domain; indicates that the public can always
     "just say no to licensing and to technically protected content";
     and emphasizes that public domain and fair use advocates need a
     "positive agenda" that "should be grounded on the realization that
     information is not only or mainly a commodity; it is also a
     critically important resource and input to learning, culture,
     competition, innovation, and democratic discourse." (This article
     is part of a special issue on the public domain that includes
     twelve other articles.) - [28]CB

     Smith, Abby. [29]New-Model Scholarship: How Will It Survive?
     Washington, D.C.: Council on Library and Information Resources,
     March 2003.
     (http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub114/contents.html). -
     Web-based scholarly resources and related digital objects comprise
     the 'new-model' referred to in the title, and the 'survival' is of
     the long-term, archival variety. Such resources created by faculty
     and students have generally been shaped by the immediate goals for
     the particular project, and frequently the planning necessary for
     future preservation in a digital archive has been overlooked. In
     this report Abby Smith, director of programs at the Council on
     Library and Information Resources, examines current problems in
     digital stewardship. She describes the genesis of three projects
     (MIT's [30]History of Recent Science and Technology, George Mason
     University's [31]Center for History and New Media, and the
     University of Virginia's [32]Institute for Advanced Technology in
     the Humanities) as case studies, contrasting those factors which
     facilitate or discourage their incorporation and accessibility in
     an archive. After a discussion of the issues to be addressed in
     deciding what to preserve and how to do it, she looks at
     organizations which are engaging in such preservation, including
     universities, publishers and government agencies. This thorough
     report is worth reviewing by those already involved in digital
     libraries and very valuable for those just getting started. With
     bibliography and website references. - JR

     Thirunarayanan, M.O.. "[33]From Thinkers to Clickers: The World
     Wide Web and the Transformation of the Essence of Being Human"
     [34]Ubiquity: an ACM IT Magazine and Forum 4(11) (May 13-19,
     2003) (http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/views/m_thirunarayanan_8.html).
     - The premise of this short article is that people are becoming
     robotic clickers rather than thinking beings. Information is
     instantly available on the world wide web, only a click away. When
     books had to be read in order to arrive at answers, the slowness of
     the task led people to think their way through problems. Often
     solutions were found just by thinking out the problem. Now clicking
     preempts thinking The vastness of the web, distracting ads, broken
     links, and other distractions lead to endless and mindless
     clicking. "...hyperclick hysteria sets in, and people lose their
     bearings in cyberspace..." The author concludes his thesis on this
     sorry state of affairs by redefining human beings. He paraphrases
     Rene Descartes: "I click therefore I am" - [35]MG

     Zeldman, Jeffrey. Designing With Web Standards Indianapolis: New
     Riders, 2003. - Believe it or not, this is actually a good time to
     be involved in web development. Not financially, that's a disaster,
     but because of the point we're at in our understanding of what
     needs to be done and how we ought to go about doing it. Information
     architecture, usability, user-centered design and all the countless
     more specialized variations of the same are now standard to the
     development process. They lend a certain accountability to our
     design. What's more, they tend to mesh better with the visual and
     programming end of things (theoretically at least) and this more
     balanced approach is a welcomed alternative to all the grousing
     about each other's excesses in days gone by. This growing maturity
     is also reflected in the nuts and bolts of actually building a site
     which this book by Zeldman chiefly addresses. Time was when you
     pretty much had to hack your way to building a site. Either there
     were no standards or the standards (such as they were) were poorly
     implemented. This forced designers to design not to a single rule
     but to the countless vagaries of various browsers and browser
     versions. Such a predicament couldn't last forever. Eventually
     Zeldman and a number of other web designers and developers got
     together and formed the Web Standards Project (WaSP) that
     worked/cajoled browser makers to come out with more
     standards-friendly products. But that was only the first part. The
     second part was to show web designers and developers what actually
     could be accomplished using the tools so painfully won over. This
     crucial bit of advocacy was done not only through Zeldman's own
     site or the affiliated Alistapart.com but everywhere from glish.com
     to the [36]interesting work of Chris Casciano. It's really a story
     of designers and developers picking themselves up by their
     bootstraps and moving an industry populated by the likes of
     Microsoft and AOL/Netscape towards more acceptable practices. It's
     a process that anyone having anything to do with web design and
     development can take pride in. It's also a process that's anywhere
     but complete. Zeldman's book is a survey of where we stand today. -
     [37]LRK
     _________________________________________________________________

                      Current Cites - ISSN: 1060-2356
   Copyright (c) 2003 by the Regents of the University of California All
                              rights reserved.

   Copying is permitted for noncommercial use by computerized bulletin
   board/conference systems, individual scholars, and libraries.
   Libraries are authorized to add the journal to their collections at no
   cost. This message must appear on copied material. All commercial use
   requires permission from the editor. All product names are trademarks
   or registered trade marks of their respective holders. Mention of a
   product in this publication does not necessarily imply endorsement of
   the product. To subscribe to the Current Cites distribution list, send
   the message "sub cites [your name]" to
   [38]listserv@library.berkeley.edu, replacing "[your name]" with your
   name. To unsubscribe, send the message "unsub cites" to the same
   address.

References

   Visible links
   1. LYNXIMGMAP:http://sunsite/CurrentCites/2003/cc03.14.6.html#head
   2. http://escholarship.cdlib.org/rtennant/
   3. http://info.lib.uh.edu/cwb/bailey.htm
   4. http://www.cam.org/~mgross/mgross.htm
   5. http://iir.berkeley.edu/faculty/huwe/
   6. http://hooboy.blogspot.com/
   7. http://leoklein.com/
   8. http://www.business2.com/articles/mag/0%2C1640%2C49475%2C00.html
   9. http://www.business2.com/
  10. http://www.overture.com/
  11. http://www.howstuffworks.com/banner-ad.htm
  12. http://www.marketingterms.com/dictionary/skyscraper_ad/
  13. http://emerging.com/viewpoint/weir2.shtml
  14. http://www.google.com/
  15. http://www.aol.com/
  16. http://www.amazon.com/
  17. http://disney.go.com/
  18. http://hooboy.blogspot.com/
  19. http://www.mba.vanderbilt.edu/ray.friedman/pdf/emailescalation.pdf
  20. http://mba.vanderbilt.edu/
  21. http://hooboy.blogspot.com/
  22. http://iir.berkeley.edu/faculty/huwe/
  23. http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/ciltop.htm
  24. http://digital.library.pitt.edu/pittsburgh/
  25. http://leoklein.com/
  26.
http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?66+Law+&+Contemp.+Probs.+147+(WinterSpring+2003)
  27. http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/lcp/index.htm
  28. http://info.lib.uh.edu/cwb/bailey.htm
  29. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub114/contents.html
  30. http://hrst.mit.edu/
  31. http://chnm.gmu.edu/
  32. http://www.iath.virginia.edu/
  33. http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/views/m_thirunarayanan_8.html
  34. http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/
  35. http://www.cam.org/~mgross/mgross.htm
  36. http://placenamehere.com/neuralustmirror/200202/
  37. http://leoklein.com/
  38. mailto:listserv@library.berkeley.edu


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

---------

Bu arsiv hypermail 2.1.2 tarafindan uretilmistir.